- Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:47:51 pm
#2227
Well if you're gonna go... a double-blindsides one hell of a way to do it.
had a feeling Drew would be early defector from yall.Joaquin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:49:05 pmLol. No terrible Ponderosas from me this time. And I get to enjoy my vacation!
Dale and I sniffed out that Drew had flipped on us earlier today, should have been my first instinct even though I think it was stupid. Just didn't think Caryn would want to lose a meat shield so early.
I am actually not thinking it was a great game move from him, I attracted the attention from pretty much everyone and kept it off him. Plus, I'm actually really good friends with him outside of the game and was willing to play my idol for himGary wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:51:32 pmhad a feeling Drew would be early defector from yall.Joaquin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:49:05 pmLol. No terrible Ponderosas from me this time. And I get to enjoy my vacation!
Dale and I sniffed out that Drew had flipped on us earlier today, should have been my first instinct even though I think it was stupid. Just didn't think Caryn would want to lose a meat shield so early.
I think she maybe felt outside of you 4 vets? Only thing I could think of. She was very popular though and probably had a lot of people trying to pull her around. Did you tell her about the vote against me?Joaquin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:00:30 pmI also really am curious to see how Danni plays this. We were best friends and allies all pre merge and then as soon as the merge hit just kept getting more distant when I had her back 100%. If it's because she didn't think she could beat me and Dale in the end that's one thing but if it was for another reason I think it's dumb
Honestly so fair about the fake thing, but clearly now you regret not getting out Drew when I said something? Also no offense but really, Drew was busy and kind of boring so him > me? Ok.
Brian, me Joaq, and Drew played together in Indonesia and me and Drew were partners in Allies. Why would we turn on Drew when we knew you’d probably flip at the merge anyways and go back to Gary and Lydia. I know you’re mad and you think you would have won this season blah blah, but you gotta let it go. Don’t be me in Allies. Stranded isn’t that important, I promise.
When has anyone been allowed to re enter the game to replace someone though? If anything THAT would have been the real bullshit. I’d have been so mad and if you made it to FTC I’d have made sure you lost because you got two chances while the rest only had one.Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:41:20 amLmao oops, didn’t know that. That adds up since honestly Drew has gotten by on that in my opinion. I am mainly mad because of the bullshit twist I left on and then not being allowed to straight up replace Jim, not because of being out in general.Dale wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:11:56 amBrian, me Joaq, and Drew played together in Indonesia and me and Drew were partners in Allies. Why would we turn on Drew when we knew you’d probably flip at the merge anyways and go back to Gary and Lydia. I know you’re mad and you think you would have won this season blah blah, but you gotta let it go. Don’t be me in Allies. Stranded isn’t that important, I promise.
I guess this where we just agree to disagree. I don’t think an inactive should remain in over an active player and I was truly offended when that occurred. But you all should feel worse because you all couldn’t just put things aside and boot him the next round. So yeah my bigger problems are with Jim here but the twist is bullshit still because while sure, we could’ve, no one was going to and we know it. Plus Jim made a good point there, nobody was going to go with a suggested target anyways. So it wouldn’t have made a difference. Plus the immunity challenge was luck too which I also found to be a problem. I don’t think I was robbed for gameplay reasons, more just the twist that unfairly fucked me over and shouldn’t have happened in the first place.Joaquin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:50:38 pmWould have been bullshit if you were allowed back in. I was already talking shit about you to bond with other people, if you magically re-entered the game that affects the entire strategy of the game.
Again, to re-emphasize Probst's point, the twist is a bit odd but 1) we had plenty of time to strategize a vote and no one wanted to say a thing 2) if anything blame Jim for not taking himself out a day or two earlier
We had the same twist last season and there were people that spoke out about who they wanted to vote out. Pretty much all of us got on the same page that way. I'm saying that would have worked this season, but it's just proof that the twist isn't all to blame. I think the mindset of everyone in the game was the problem.Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:57:36 pmI guess this where we just agree to disagree. I don’t think an inactive should remain in over an active player and I was truly offended when that occurred. But you all should feel worse because you all couldn’t just put things aside and boot him the next round. So yeah my bigger problems are with Jim here but the twist is bullshit still because while sure, we could’ve, no one was going to and we know it. Plus Jim made a good point there, nobody was going to go with a suggested target anyways. So it wouldn’t have made a difference. Plus the immunity challenge was luck too which I also found to be a problem. I don’t think I was robbed for gameplay reasons, more just the twist that unfairly fucked me over and shouldn’t have happened in the first place.Joaquin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:50:38 pmWould have been bullshit if you were allowed back in. I was already talking shit about you to bond with other people, if you magically re-entered the game that affects the entire strategy of the game.
Again, to re-emphasize Probst's point, the twist is a bit odd but 1) we had plenty of time to strategize a vote and no one wanted to say a thing 2) if anything blame Jim for not taking himself out a day or two earlier
I'm not saying*Ryan wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:25:33 pmWe had the same twist last season and there were people that spoke out about who they wanted to vote out. Pretty much all of us got on the same page that way. I'm saying that would have worked this season, but it's just proof that the twist isn't all to blame. I think the mindset of everyone in the game was the problem.Brian wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:57:36 pmI guess this where we just agree to disagree. I don’t think an inactive should remain in over an active player and I was truly offended when that occurred. But you all should feel worse because you all couldn’t just put things aside and boot him the next round. So yeah my bigger problems are with Jim here but the twist is bullshit still because while sure, we could’ve, no one was going to and we know it. Plus Jim made a good point there, nobody was going to go with a suggested target anyways. So it wouldn’t have made a difference. Plus the immunity challenge was luck too which I also found to be a problem. I don’t think I was robbed for gameplay reasons, more just the twist that unfairly fucked me over and shouldn’t have happened in the first place.Joaquin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:50:38 pmWould have been bullshit if you were allowed back in. I was already talking shit about you to bond with other people, if you magically re-entered the game that affects the entire strategy of the game.
Again, to re-emphasize Probst's point, the twist is a bit odd but 1) we had plenty of time to strategize a vote and no one wanted to say a thing 2) if anything blame Jim for not taking himself out a day or two earlier